links for 2007-01-31

31-Jan-07

links for 2007-01-30

30-Jan-07

links for 2007-01-29

29-Jan-07

links for 2007-01-28

28-Jan-07

links for 2007-01-26

26-Jan-07

Ryszard Kapuscinski

25-Jan-07

Ryszard Kapuscinski has died. It is terribly sad news, but we are all lucky that someone so gifted as a writer and someone so insanely, recklessly adventurous as a reporter was able to spend forty years doing what he did best.

His books about bad times and ordinary lives in Iran, Latin America, the Soviet Empire and (especially) Africa combined an unblinking scrutiny of human depravity with relentless empathy and compassion. They are full of bizarre and extraordinary events, but he was fascinated more by the strange than by the spectacular, more by moods and personal experience than by the great sweep of history. Even from his numerous brushes with death (nearly drowning off Zanzibar, catching malaria in Uganda, passing out from heat and thirst in the Sahara, to name a few) and other presumably terrifying ordeals he always picked out the beautiful image or the disarming moment of empathy that suddenly puts you right on the spot. He de-mystified ‘exotic’ places or people, bringing home how our culture and our worldview are shaped by our environment, whether it is one of comfort or extreme deprivation. And he loved Africa in particular, with an intensity that is infectious.

Kapuscinski was named “journalist of the century” in Poland (where they read his descriptions of the mad Emperor Selassie as a thinly-disguised commentary on life under communism back home) and I find it hard to think of anyone better from anywhere else. I can’t say his books brought me joy per se - they were too preoccupied with the messy and tragic for that. But they brought me life. Everyone should read them.

Here are obituaries from the Guardian and the Times, and here is a wonderful appreciation from Shefa Siegel: “Kapuscinski did what journalists were invented to do, which is give humanity to those who are different from ourselves”.

links for 2007-01-24

24-Jan-07

Tierra y Libertad

22-Jan-07

A right-wing think-tank produces another statistical hodge-podge designed to promote their favourite policies. Nothing new there. But looking at the rankings, I can’t help but notice that in the two supposedly most laissez-faire countries in the world, Hong Kong and Singapore, most land is owned by the state and most (Singapore) or at least a very sizeable proportion (Hong Kong) of the population lives in public housing (albeit not quite as we know it in the UK).

As Sock-Yong Phang says of Singapore, this isn’t quite Georgist land-taxation, but it does capture a good chunk of land rents. And the revenues from leases, which are pretty big, help keep the income taxes which Heritage focuses on so low and thus economic ‘freedom’ so high, as well as making public housing of both low cost and reasonable quality available to great swathes of the citizenry.

Should we be surprised that Heritage and other free-marketeers tend to ignore such significant features of these highly successful economies? A charitable interpretation is that they’ve chosen not to highlight the approach of HK and Singapore because it’s not completely clear how much other countries could or should try to emulate it. But I think it’s more likely that when the Singaporean government says of their land planning policy that “Laissez-faire has never been a viable option for us“, it just doesn’t fit very well with the simplistic morality tale of government cutting taxes and getting out of the way of private business which appeals to think-tankers.

links for 2007-01-22

22-Jan-07

links for 2007-01-21

21-Jan-07

links for 2007-01-17

17-Jan-07

links for 2007-01-16

16-Jan-07

links for 2007-01-15

15-Jan-07

links for 2007-01-14

14-Jan-07

links for 2007-01-12

12-Jan-07

Lest we forget

11-Jan-07

The Adam Smith Institute’s craven attempt at damage limitation following their ludicrous post about climate change seems to be blowing up in their faces somewhat, which is only right and proper. Tim Lambert picked up my post about my comments on Alister McFarquhar’s outlandish claims being deleted and my IP address blocked, and sent a trackback to the original post. Tim’s being a fairly high-profile blog, this seems to have panicked the ASI completely, as they decided there was nothing for it but to delete the offending post and pretend the whole embarrassing affair never happened.

Alas, as Ian Bertram points out, they reckoned without the all-seeing Google cache, which will hopefully preserve McFarquhar’s thoughts on climate change for the enjoyment of future generations. Just in case that doesn’t work, I’ve reprinted the text of it below the fold here.

(more…)

links for 2007-01-11

11-Jan-07

links for 2007-01-10

10-Jan-07

links for 2007-01-09

09-Jan-07

Consensus-building at the Adam Smith Institute

08-Jan-07

Isn’t it interesting how those who believe in a free market of goods and services sometimes seem to prefer command-and-control when it comes to exchanging ideas?

Take that nice discussion I was having about climate change with Alister McFarquhar of the Adam Smith Institute. He claimed to have evidence that most scientists didn’t think man could affect climate, and I asked him for it. He offered Benny Peiser’s ’survey’ of the literature, and I pointed out that Peiser had subsequently admitted he was 97% wrong.

Undaunted, Alister decided that his new conclusive proof was the online survey carried out by Dennis Bray supposedly canvassing the views of professional climate scientists. Again, I pointed out that this was no proof at all, since the survey had been compromised when the access password was posted to the climatesceptics discussion group (of which I believe McFarquhar is a member).*

Now, to his credit McFarquhar was at least trying to provide evidence for his argument, even if it was very, very bad evidence. Alas, just when the exchange was getting interesting, someone at the ASI with too much time on their hands (wait, that’s all of them) decided that even by their standards McFarquhar was starting to look too silly and simply deleted the whole comments thread.**

Look, no more dissent! Hey, sometimes consensus isn’t so hard to achieve after all.

*Thanks to Tim Lambert for helping expose the flaws in both Peiser’s and Bray’s research
**Not only that, they appear to have banned me from even looking at their website with some form of IP-blocking device. Gosh, what a mature and professional bunch of intellectuals they are.